PISA: читацька грамотність - Т. С. Вакуленко 2017

Список літератури

American Press Institute. (2014). How Americans get their news. Retrieved from http://www.americanpressinstitute.org/publications/reports/survey-research/how-americans-get-news/.

Ananiadou, K., & Claro, M. (2009). 21st century skills and competences for new millennium learners in OECD countries [OECD Education Working Papers, No. 41]. Paris: OECD Publishing. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/218525261154.

Artelt, C., Schiefele, U., & Schneider ,W. (2001). Predictors of reading literacy. European Journal of Psychology of Education.

Barth, A. E., Catts, H. W., & Anthony, J. A. (2009). The component skills underlying reading fluency among adolescent readers: A latent variable approach. Reading and Writing, 22, 567-590. doi:10.1007/s11145-008-9125-y.

Becker, M., McElvany, N., & Kortenbruck, M. (2010). Intrinsic and extrinsic reading motivation as predictors of reading literacy: A longitudinal study. Journal of Educational psychology, 102, 773-785. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0020084.

Binkley, M., Erstad, O., Herman, J., Raizen, S., Ripley. M., & Rumble, M. (2010). Draft white paper 1: Defining 21st century skills. The University of Melbourne: Assessment and Teaching of 21st Century Skills.

Binkley, M., Rust, K., & Williams, T. (Eds.). (1997). Reading literacy in an international perspective. Washington, D.C.: US Department of Education.

Brand-Gruwel, S., Wopereis, I., & Vermetten, Y. (2005). Information problem solving by experts and novices: Analysis of a complex cognitive skill. Computers in Human Behavior, 21, 487-508.

Braten, I., Britt, M. A., Str0ms0, H. I., & Rouet, J.-F. (2011).The role of epistemic beliefs in the comprehensionof multiple expository texts: Toward an integrated model. Educational Psychologist, 46(1), 48-70.

Braten, I., Str0ms0, H.I., & Britt, M.A. (2009). Trust matters: Examining the role of source evaluation in students' construction of meaning within and across multiple texts. Reading Research Quarterly, 44, 6-28.

Britt, M. A., Goldman, S. R., & Rouet, J.-F. (Eds.). (2012). Reading: From words to multiple texts. New York: Routledge.

Britt, M. A., & Rouet, J.-F. (2012). Learning with multiple documents: Component skills and their acquisition. In M. J. Lawson & J. R. Kirby (Eds.), The quality of learning: Dispositions, instruction, and mental structures. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Brown, A. L., Palincsar, A. S & Armbruster, B. (1984). Inducing comprehension-fostering activities in interactive learning situations. In H. Mandel, N. Stein, & T. Trabasso (Eds.), Learning from texts. Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Brozo, W. G., & Simpson, M. L. (2007). Content literacy for today's adolescents: Honoring diversity and building competence (5th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill/Prentice Hall.\

Cain, K., & Oakhill, J. (2006). Assessment matters: Issues in the measurement of reading comprehension. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, 697-708.

Cain, K., & Oakhill, J. (2007). Children’s Comprehension Problems in Oral and Written Language: A Cognitive Perspective. New York: Guilford Press.

Cantrell, S. C., Almasi, J. F., Carter, J. C., Rintamaa, M., & Madden, A. (2010). The impact of a strategybased intervention on the comprehension and strategy use of struggling adolescent readers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102(2), 257-280.

Carver, R. P. (1997). Reading for one second, one minute, or one year from the perspective of rauding theory. Scientific Studies of Reading, 1(1), 3-43.

Chard, D. J., Pikulski, J. J., & McDonagh, S. H. (2006). Fluency: The link between decoding and comprehension for struggling readers. In T. Rasinski, C. Blanchowicz, & K. Lems (Eds.), Fluency instruction: Research based best practices (pp. 39-61). New York: Guilford Press.

Clark, C. (2014). Children's and young people's reading in 2013. Findings from the 2013 National Literacy Trust's annual survey. London: National Literacy Trust.

Coiro, J., Knobel, M., Lankshear, C., & Leu, D. (2008). Central issues in new literacies and new literacies research. In J. Coiro, M. Knobel, C. Lankshear, & D. Leu (Eds.), The handbook of research on new literacies. Mahwah, NJ.: Erlbaum.

Conklin, J. (1987). Hypertext: An introduction and survey. Computer, 20, 17-41. Council of Europe. (1996). Modern languages: Learning, teaching, assessment. A common European framework of reference. Strasbourg: CC LANG (95) 5 Rev. IV.

Council of Europe. (2001). The Common European framework of reference for languages: Learning, teaching, assessment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Cunningham, A. E., & Stanovich, K. E. (1998). Early reading acquisition and its relation to reading experience and ability 10 years later. Developmental Psychology, 33, 934-945.

Darling-Hammond, L. (2001). The right to learn: A blueprint for creating schools that work (1st ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass/ Wiley.

Dillon, A. (1994). Designing usable electronic text: Ergonomic aspects of human information usage. London: Taylor & Francis. Dreher, M. J., & Guthrie, J. T. (1990). Cognitive processes in textbook chapter search tasks. Reading Research Quarterly, 25, 323-339.

Duggan, G. B., & Payne, S. J. (2009) Text skimming: the process and effectiveness of foraging through text under time pressure. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 15(3). 228-242.

Eason, S., Sabatini, J., Goldberg, L. F., Bruce, K., & Cutting, L. E. (2012). Examining the relationship between word reading efficiency and oral reading rate in predicting comprehension among different types of readers. Scientific Studies of Reading, 17, 199-223.

Foltz, P. W. (1996). Comprehension, coherence, and strategies in hypertext and linear text. In J. Levonen, J.-F. Rouet, A. Dillon, & R. Spiro (Eds.), Hypertext and cognition (pp. 109-136). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Gartner. (2015). Forecast: PCs, ultramobiles and mobile phones, worldwide, 2011-2018, 4Q14 update. Retrieved from http://www.gartner.com/document/2945917.

Gerjets, P., Kammerer, Y., & Werner, B. (2011). Measuring spontaneous and instructed evaluation processes during web search: Integrating concurrent thinking-aloud protocols and eye-tracking data. Learning and Instruction, 21, 220-231. doi: 10.101 6/j.learninstruc.2010.02.005.

Goldman, S. R. (2004). Cognitive aspects of constructing meaning through and across multiple texts. In N. Shuart-Faris & D. Bloome, (Eds.), Uses of intertextuality in classroom and educational research, (pp. 317-351). Greenwich, CT: Information Age.

Gray, W. S., & Rogers, B. (1956). Maturity in reading. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

Grisay, A., & Monseur, C. (2007). Measuring the equivalence of item difficulty in the various versions of an international test. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 33, 69-86.

Guthrie, J. T. (1988). Locating information in documents: Examination of a cognitive model. Reading Research Quarterly, 23, 178-199.

Guthrie, J. T., Ho, A. N., & Klauda, S. L. (2013). Modeling the relationships among reading instruction, motivation, engagement, and achievement for adolescents. Reading Research Quarterly, 48, 9-26.

Guthrie, J. T., & Klauda, S. L. (2014). Effects of classroom practices on reading comprehension, engagement, and motivations for adolescents. Reading Research Quarterly, 49(4), 387-416. doi:10.1002/rrq.81.

Guthrie, J. T., & Wigfield, A. (2000). Engagement and motivation in reading. In M. L. Kamil & P. B. Mosenthal (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. 3, pp. 403-422). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

Guthrie, J. T., Wigfield, A., Metsala, J. L., & Cox, K. E. (1999). Motivational and cognitive predictors of text comprehension and reading amount. Scientific Studies of Reading, 3(3), 231-256. doi:10.1207/ s1532799xssr0303_3.

Guthrie, J. T., Wigfield, A., & Klauda, S. L. (2012). Adolescents' engagement in academic literacy (Report N°7). University of Maryland, College Park. Retrieved from http://www.corileaming.com/researchpublications.

Guthrie, J. T., Wigfield, A., & You, W. (2012). Instructional contexts for engagement and achievement in reading. In S. L. Christensen, A. L. Reschly, & C. Wylie (Eds.), Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 601-634). New York: Springer Science. doi:10.1007/978-1 -4614-2018-7_29.

Hacker, D.J. (1998). Self-regulated comprehension during normal reading. In D. Hacker, J. Dunlowsky, & A. Graesser (Eds.) Metacognition in educational theory and practice (pp. 165-191). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

Heckman, J. J., & Kautz, T. (2012). Hard evidence on soft skills. Bonn, Germany: Institute for the Study of Labor.

Hofstetter, C. R., Sticht, T. G., & Hofstetter, C. H. (1999). Knowledge, literacy and power, Communication Research, 26, 58-80.

Hubbard, R. (1989), Notes from the underground: Unofficial literacy in one sixth grade. Anthropology and Education Quarterly, 20, 291-307.

International Telecommunications Union. (2014a). Measuring the Information Society Report 2014. Geneva (Switzerland): ITU. Retrieved from http://www.itu.int/en/ITUD/Statistics/Pages/publications/ mis2014.aspx.

International Telecommunications Union. (2014b). Key 2005-2014 ICT data for the world, by geographic regions and by level of development [Excel file]. Geneva (Switzerland): ITU. Retrieved from http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Pages/publications/mis20i4.aspx.

Jenkins, J. R., Fuchs, L. S., van den Broek, P., Espin, C., & Deno, S. L. (2003). Sources of individual differences in reading comprehension and reading fluency. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95(4), 719-729.

Kame’enui, E. J., & Simmons, D. C. (2001). Introduction to this special issue: The DNA of reading fluency. Scientific Studies of Reading, 5(3), 203-210.

Kamil, M. J., Mosenthal, P. B., Pearson, P. D., & Barr, R. (Eds.). (2000). Handbook of reading research (Vol. 3). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Kim, Y., Park, C., & Wagner, R. (2014). Is oral/text reading fluency a «bridge» to reading comprehension? Reading and Writing, 27(1), 79-99.

Kintsch, W. (1998). Comprehension: A paradigm for cognition. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

Kirsch, I. (2001). The international adult literacy survey: Understanding what was measured, Educational Testing Service, Princeton, NJ.

Kirsch, I., & Mosenthal, P. B. (1990). Exploring document literacy: Variables underlying the performance of young adults. Reading Research Quarterly, 25(1), pp. 5-30.

Kirsch, I., De Jong, J., Lafontaine, D., McQueen, J., Mendelovits, J., & Monseur, C. (2002). Reading for change: Performance and engagement across countries: Results from PISA 2000. Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.

Klauda, S. L., & Guthrie, J. T. (2015). Comparing relations of motivation, engagement, and achievement among struggling and advanced adolescent readers. Reading and Writing. doi:10.1007/s11145-014-9523-2.

Kuhn, M. R., Schwanenflugel, P. J., & Meisinger, E. B. (2010). Aligning theory and assessment of reading fluency: Automaticity, prosody, and definitions of fluency. Reading Research Quarterly, 45, 230-251. doi:10.1598/RRQ.45.2.4.

Kuhn, M. R., & Stahl, S. (2003). Fluency: A review of developmental and remedial practices. The Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 3-21.

Lafontaine, D., & Monseur, C. (2006a). Impact of item choice on the measurement of trends in educational achievement. Paper presented at the AERA meeting, San Francisco. Lafontaine, D., & Monseur, C. (2006b). Impact oftest characteristics on gender equity indicators in the Assessment of Reading Comprehension. University of Liege, Liege.

Lai, A. S., Benjamin. R. G., Schwanenflugel. J. P., & Kuhn, R. M. (2014). The longitudinal relationship between reading fluency and reading comprehension skills in second-grade children. Reading & Writing Quarterly: Overcoming Learning Difficulties, 30, 116-138. DOI:10.1080/10573569.2013.789785.

Landerl, K., & Reiter, C. (2002). Lesegeschwindigkeit als Indikator fur basale Lesefertigkeiten. [Reading fluency as an indicator for basic reading skills]. In C. Wallner-Paschon & G. Haider (Eds.), PISA Plus 2000. Thematische Analysen nationaler Projekte [PISA Plus 2000. Thematic analyses of national projects]. Innsburck: Studien Verlag.

Language and Reading Research Consortium. (2015). Learning to read: Should we keep things simple? Reading Research Quarterly, 50, 151-169.

Lathrop, R. (2005). Democratic schools: Empowering students through active learning and applied civic education. ProQuest Information and Learning Company. (UMI No. 1428169).

Legault, L., Green-Demers, I., & Pelletier, L. (2006). Why do high school students lack motivation in the classroom? Toward and understanding of academic motivation and the role of social support. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98, 567-582. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.98.3.567.

Leu, D. J., Kinzer, C. K., Coiro, J., Castek, J., & Henry, L. A. (2013). New literacies: A dual-level theory of the changing nature of literacy instruction and assessment. In D. E. Alvermann, N. J. Unrau, & R. B. Rudell (Eds.), Theoretical models and processes of reading (6th edition, pp. 1150-1181). Newark: International Reading Association.

Leu, D. J., Forzani, E., Rhoads, C., Maykel, C., Kennedy, C., & Timbrell, N. (2015). The new literacies of online reading and comprehension: Rethinking the reading achievement gap. Reading Research Quarterly, 50(1), 37-59.

Lundberg, I. (1991). Reading as an individual and social skill. In I. Lundberg & T. H0ien (Eds.), Literacy in a world of change: Perspectives on reading and reading disability. Stavanger: Center for Reading Research/UNESCO.

Mason, L., Boldrin, A., & Ariasi, N. (2010). Searching the Web to learn about a controversial topic: are students epistemically active? Instructional Science, 38, 607-633.

McCrudden, M. T., Magliano, J., & Schraw, G. (Eds.). (2011). Text relevance and learning from text. Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.

McCrudden, M. T., & Schraw, G. (2007). Relevance and goal-focusing in text processing. Educational Psychology Review, 19(2), 113-139.

McNamara, D. S., & Magliano, J. (2009). Toward a comprehensive model of comprehension. Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 51, 297-384.

Mol, S., & Bus, A. G. (2011). To read or not to read: A meta-analysis of print exposure from infancy to early adulthood. Psychological Bulletin, 137, 267-296. doi:10.1037/a0021890.

Moore, P. (1995). Information problem-solving: A wider view of library skills. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 20, 1-31.

Morgan, P., & Fuchs, D. (2007). Is there a bidirectional relationship between children's reading skills and reading motivation? Exceptional Children, 73, 165-183.

Morrisroe, J. (2014). Literacy changes lives: A new perspective on health, employment and crime. London: National Literacy Trust. National Reading Panel (2000). Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development. Naumann, J. (2015). A model of online reading engagement: Linking engagement, navigation, and performance in digital reading. Computers in Human Behavior, 53, 263-277.

Nielsen, J. (1999). Designing web usability: The practice of simplicity. New Riders Publishing, Indianapolis. Naumann, J. (2015). A model of online reading engagement: Linking engagement, navigation, and performance in digital reading. Computers in Human Behavior, 53, 263-277. doi:10.1016/j. chb.2015.06.051.

Oakhill, J. V., Cain, K., & Bryant, P. E. (2003). The dissociation of word reading and text comprehension: Evidence from component skills. Language and Cognitive Processes, 18, 443-468.

OECD. (2000). Measuring student knowledge and skills. The PISA 2000 Assessment of Reading, Mathematical and Scientific Literacy. Paris: OECD. Retrieved from

http://www.oecd.org/education/school/program meforinternationalstudentassessmentpisa/33692793.pdf.

OECD. (2002). Reading for change - Performance and engagement across countries, OECD, Paris.

OECD. (2004). Learning for tomorrow's world: First results from PISA 2003. Paris: OECD.

OECD. (2007). PISA 2006 science competencies for tomorrow's world, volume 1: Analysis. Paris: OECD.

OECD. (2010a). PISA 2009 assessment framework - Key competencies in reading, mathematics and science. Paris: Author. Retrieved from

http://www.oecd.org/pisa/pisaproducts/pisa2009assessmentframewor kkeycompetenciesinreadingmathematicsandscience.htm.

OECD. (2010b). PISA 2009 results: Learning to learn - Student engagement, strategies and practices (volume III). PISA/ OECD Publishing. Retrieved from http://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/education/pisa-2009-resultslearning-to-learn 9789264083943-en.

OECD. (2011). PISA: Do students today read for pleasure? PISA in Focus, vol.8, p. 20. Paris: OECD.

OECD. (2011). PISA 2009 results: Students on Line. Digital technologies and performance. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264112995-en.

OECD. (2012). The OECD Internet economy outlook. Retrieved from http://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/science-andtechnology/oecd-internet-economy-outlook-2012 978926408646.3-en.

OECD. (2013a). OECD skills outlook 2013: First results from the Survey of Adult Skills. OECD Publishing. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264204256-en.

OECD. (2013b). PISA 2015 draft frameworks. Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/pisa/pisaproducts/pisa2015draftframeworks.htm.

OECD. (2014). PISA 2012 results: What students know and can do (Volume I, Revised edition, February 2014): Student Performance in Mathematics, Reading and Science, PISA, OECD Publishing, Paris. DOI:

http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264208780-en.

OECD. (2015), Students, computers and learning: Making the connection. PISA, OECD Publishing, Paris. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264239555-en.

O’Reilly, T., & Sabatini, J. (2013). Reading for understanding: How performance moderators and scenarios impact assessment design (ETS Research Report No. RR-13-31). Retrieved from http://www.ets.org/Media/Research/pdf/RR-13-31.pdf.

Ozuru, Y., Best, R., Bell, C., Witherspoon, A., & McNamara, D. S. (2007). Influence of question format and text availability on the assessment of expository text comprehension. Cognition and Instruction, 25, 399438. doi:10.1080/07370000701632371.

Perfetti, C. A. (1985). Reading Ability. New York: Oxford University Press.

Perfetti, C. A. (2007). Reading ability: Lexical quality to comprehension. Scientific Studies of Reading, 11, 357-383.

Perfetti, C.A., Marron, M.A., & Foltz, P.W. (1996). Sources of comprehension failure: Theoretical perspectives and case studies. In C. Cornoldi & J. Oakhill (Eds.), Reading comprehension difficulties: Processes and intervention. Lawrence Erlbaum; Mahwah, NJ: 1996.

Perfetti, C. A., Rouet, J.-F., & Britt, M. A. (1999). Toward a theory of documents representation. In H. van Oostendorp & S. Goldman (Eds.), The construction of mental representations during reading (pp. 99122). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

Pfost, M., Dorfler, T., & Artelt, C. (2013). Students¹ extracurricular reading behavior and the development of vocabulary and reading comprehension. Learning and Individual Differences, 26, 89-102. doi:10.1016/j. lindif.2013.04.008.

Pressley, M. (2000). What should comprehension instruction be the instruction of? In M. L. Kamil, P. B. Mosenthal, P. D. Pearson, & R. Barr (Eds.), Handbook of reading research, (Vol. III, pp. 545-563). NJ: L. Erlbaum.

Rasinski, T.V., Padak, N.D., McKeon, C.A., Wilfong, L.G., Friedauer, J.A., & Heim, P. (2005). Is reading fluency a key for successful high school reading? Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy, 49, 22-27.

Rayner, K. (1997). Understanding eye movements in reading. Scientific Studies of Reading, 1(4), 317.

Rayner, K., Chace, K. H., Slattery, T. J., & Ashby, J. (2006). Eye movements as reflections of comprehension processes in reading. Scientific Studies of Reading, 10(3), 241-255.

Rayner, K., Foorman, B. R., Perfetti, C. A., Pesetsky, D., & Seidenberg, M. S. (2001). How psychological science informs the teaching of reading. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 2(2), 31 -74.

Reeve, J. (2012). A self-determination theory perspective on student engagement. In S.L. Christensen, A.L. Reschly, & C. Wylie (Eds.), Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 149-173). New York: Springer Science. doi:10.1007/978-1 -4614-2018-7_7.

Reschly, A. M., Busch, T. W., Betts, J., Deno, S. L., & Long, J. D. (2009). Curriculum-based measurement oral reading as an indicator of reading achievement: A meta-analysis of the correlational evidence. Journal of School Psychology, 47, 427-469.

Richter, T., & Rapp, D. N. (2014). Comprehension and validation of text information: Introduction to the special issue. Discourse Processes, 51, 1-6.

Rosenshine, B., & Meister, C. (1997). Cognitive strategy instruction in reading. In A. Stahl & A. Hayes (Eds.), Instructional models in reading, (pp. 85-107). Mahwah, NJ: L. Erlbaum.

Rouet, J.-F. (2006). The skills of document use: From text comprehension to web-based learning. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Rouet, J.-F., & Britt, M. A. (2011). Relevance processes in multiple document comprehension. In M.T. McCrudden, J. P. Magliano, & G. Schraw (Eds.), Text relevance and learning from text (pp. 1952). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.

Rouet, J.-F., & Britt, M. A. (2014). Learning from multiple documents. In Mayer, R.E. (Ed.) Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning, (2nd edition). Cambridge, MA, Cambridge University Press.

Rouet, J.-F., & Coutelet, B. (2008). The acquisition of document search strategies in grade school students. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 22: 389-406. doi: 10.1002/acp.1415.

Rouet, J.-F., & Levonen, J. J. (1996). Studying and learning with nonlinear documents: Empirical studies and their implications. In J.-F. Rouet, J.J., Levonen, A.P. Dillon, & R.J. Spiro (Eds.), Hypertext and cognition (pp. 9-24). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Rouet, J.-F., Voros, Z., & Pleh, C. (2012). Incidental learning of links during navigation: The role of visuo-spatial capacity. Behaviour and Information Technology, 31, 71-81.

Routitsky, A., & Turner, R. (2003). Item format types and their influences on cross-national comparisons of student performance. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association (AERA). Chicago: IL.

Rupp, A., Ferne, T., & Choi, H. (2006). How assessing reading comprehension with multiple-choice questions shapes the construct: A cognitive processing perspective. Language Testing, 23, 441-474.

Sabatini, J. P., & Bruce, K. M. (2009). PIAAC Reading Components: A conceptual framework (OECD Educational Working paper No. 33). Retrieved from

http://www.oecd.org/officialdocuments/publicdis playdocumentpdf/?doclanguage=en&cote=edu/wkp(2009)i2.

Sabatini, J., Petscher, Y., O'Reilly, T., & Truckenmiller, A. (2015). Improving comprehension assessment for middle and high school students: Challenges and opportunities. In. D. Reed and K. Santi (Eds). Improving reading comprehension ofmiddle and high school students, (pp. 119-151) New York: Springer.

Sabatini, J., O'Reilly, T., Halderman, L., & Bruce, K. (2014). Broadening the scope of reading comprehension using scenario-based assessments: Preliminary findings and challenges. International Journal Topics in Cognitive Psychology, 114, 693-723.

Santini, M. (2006), Web pages, text types, and linguistic features: Some issues. International Computer Archive of Modern and Medieval English (CAME), 30, 67-86.

Scammacca, N., Roberts, G., Vaughn, S., Edmonds, M., Wexler, J., Reutebuch, C.K., & Torgesen, J.K. (2006). Interventions for adolescent struggling readers. A meta-analysis with implications for practice. Portsmouth, NH: RMC Research Corporation, Center on Instruction.

Schaffner, E., Philipp, M., & Schiefele, U. (2014). Reciprocal effects between intrinsic reading motivation and reading competence? A cross-lagged panel model for academic track and non-academic track students. Journal of Research on Reading, 00 (00), 1-18. DOI:10.1111/1467-9817.12027.

Schiefele, U., Schaffner, E., Moller, J., & Wigfield, A. (2012). Dimensions of reading motivation and their relation to reading behavior and competence. Reading Research Quarterly, 47, 427-463.

Schroeder, S. (2011). What readers have and do: Effects of students' verbal ability and reading time components on comprehension with and without text availability. Journal of Educational Psychology, 103, 877-896.

Schwabe, F., McElvany, N., & Trendtel, M. (2015). The school age gender gap in reading achievement: Examining the influences of item format and intrinsic reading motivation. Reading Research Quarterly, 50(1), 1-14. doi: 10.1002/rrq.92.

Simon, H. A. (1996). Observations on the sciences of science learning. Paper prepared for the Committee on Developments in the Science of Learning for the Sciences of Science Learning: An Interdisciplinary Discussion. Department of Psychology, Carnegie Mellon University.

Singer, M. (2006). Verification of text ideas during reading. Journal of Memory and Language, 54, 574-591.

Smith, M. C., Mikulecky, L., Kibby, M. W., Dreher, M. J., & Dole, J. A. (2000). What will be the demands of literacy in the workplace in the next millennium? Reading Research Quarterly, 35(3), 378-383.

Snow and the Rand Corporation. (2002). Reading for understanding: Toward an R&D program in reading comprehension. Rand Corporation Report.

Solis, M., Miciak, J., Vaughn, S., & Fletcher, J. M. (2014). Why intensive interventions matter: Longitudinal studies of adolescents with reading disabilities and poor reading comprehension. Learning Disability Quarterly. Advance online publication. doi:10.1177/0731948714528806.

Spiro, J. J., Deschryver, M., Hagerman, M. S., Morsink, P., & Thompson, P. (Eds.). (2015). Reading at a crossroads? Disjunctures and continuities in current conceptions and practices. New York: Routledge.

Stadtler, M., & Bromme, R. (2013). Multiple document comprehension: An approach to public understanding of science. Cognition and Instruction, 31, 122-129.

Stadtler, M., & Bromme, R. (2014). The content-source integration model: A taxonomic description of how readers comprehend conflicting scientific information. In D. N. Rapp & J. Braasch (Eds.), Processing inaccurate information: Theoretical and applied perspectives from cognitive science and the educational sciences (pp. 379-402). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Str0ms0, H. I., Braten, I., Britt, M. A., & Ferguson, L. E. (2013). Spontaneous sourcing among students reading multiple documents. Cognition and Instruction, 31, 176-203.

Torgesen, J. K., Wagner, R. K., & Rashotte, C. A. (1999). Test of Word Reading Efficiency (TOWRE). Austin,TX: Pro-Ed. UNESCO. (2014). Reading in the mobile era: A study of mobile reading in developing countries. Paris: UNESCO.

van den Broek, P., Risden, K., & Husbye-Hartmann, E., (1995). The role of readers’ standards of coherence in the generation of inferences during reading. In R. F. Lorch, Jr., & E. J. O’Brien (Eds.), Sources of coherence in text comprehension (pp. 353-373). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

van den Broek, P., Virtue, S., Everson, M., Tzeng, Y., & Sung, Y. (2002). Comprehension and memory of science texts: Inferential processes and the construction of a mental representation. In J. Otero, J. Leon, & A.C. Graesser (Eds.), The psychology of science text comprehension (pp. 131-154). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

Vidal-Abarca, E., Mana, A., & Gil, L. (2010). Individual differences for self-regulating task-oriented reading activities. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102(4), 817-826. doi: 10.1037/a0020062.

Wagner, RK.; Torgesen, J.; Rashotte, CA.; Pearson, N. Test of Sentence Reading Efficiency and Comprehension. Pro-Ed; Austin, TX: 2010.

Waters, H. S., & Schneider, W. (Eds.). (2010). Metacognition, strategy use, and instruction. New York, NY, US: Guilford Press.

Wayman, M. M., Wallace, T., Wiley, H. I., Ticha, R., & Espin, C. A. (2007). Literature synthesis on curriculum based measurement in reading. The Journal of Special Education, 41(2), 85-120.

Werlich (1976). A text grammar of English. Heidelberg: Quelle and Meyer.

White, S., Chen, J., & Forsyth, B. (2010). Reading-related literacy activities of American adults: Time spent, task types, and cognitive skills used. Journal of Literacy Research, 42:3, 276-307.

Winne, P. H., & Hadwin, A. F. (1998). Studying as self-regulated learning. In D. Hacker, J. Dunlowsky,& A. Graesser (Eds.) Metacognition in educational theory and practice (pp. 277-304). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

Woodcock, R. W., McGrew, K. S., & Mather, N. (2001). Woodcock-Johnson III. Tests of Achievement. Itasca, IL: Riverside Publishing.

Zwaan, R. A., & Singer, M. (2003). Text comprehension. In A. C. Graesser, M. A. Gernsbacher, &S. R. Goldman (Eds.), Handbook of discourse processes (pp. 83-122). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.